News

Initial Coin Offerings – not immune from regulation

Home Insights Initial Coin Offerings – not immune from regulation

Published on:

Published on: August 21, 2017

Share:

Despite being a novel and still-developing form of capital raising, initial coin offerings (ICOs) raise significant questions as to how legal obligations may be enforced and applied, according to insights released today from leading law firm, Russell McVeagh.

As the world of crypto-finance continues to develop, the firm's 'Initial Coin Offerings' article considers whether New Zealand's Financial Markets Conduct Act 2013 (FMCA) could apply to the issue of digital tokens issued in an ICO.

Russell McVeagh Finance partner Deemple Budhia says that tokens issued in an ICO may be regulated by the FMCA if the offer is received by a person in New Zealand (for example if the ICO is published online without restricting access to New Zealanders). 

"The wide territorial scope of the FMCA, which may subject a significant number of ICOs to New Zealand regulatory requirements, raises important questions about the how these legal obligations can or will be enforced, and particularly, in respect of ICOs based outside New Zealand," says Budhia.

Whether the FMCA will be engaged by any particular ICO must be determined by reference to the facts and circumstances of that ICO, she says.

"For each ICO, it is necessary to qualitatively evaluate the rights conferred by the tokens issued in the ICO and evaluate these against the definitions of each of the financial products regulated by the FMCA.

"It is entirely possible that a token issued in an ICO could be classified as any one of the financial products regulated by the FMCA, or alternatively fall outside the scope of the FMCA. Where a token falls outside scope, the FMA may nevertheless use its designation power to declare a product is a financial product if the circumstances warrant such a designation," she says.

The article examines the legal implications in the context of a report published by the United States' Securities and Exchange Commission which concluded that The DAO, an unincorporated virtual organisation, and certain other associated persons, violated US federal securities laws by failing to produce and file a "registration statement" in respect of tokens issued by The DAO without qualifying for an exemption from those registration requirements.[1] The article concludes that The DAO could be regulated under the FMCA as a managed investment scheme, and the tokens issued, regulated as managed investment products.

To view the publication click here.

To view as a PDF click here.

For more information, please contact:

Joanna Comerford
Corporate Communications Manager
joanna.comerford@russellmcveagh.com
D +64 4 819 7520 or 027 911 8369

 

[1]   Report of Investigation Pursuant to Section 21(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934: The DAO (Securities and Exchange Commission, Release No. 81207, 25 July 2017) [SEC Report].

Talk to one of our experts:
Related Expertise